Post by High Priestess on Jul 22, 2018 12:42:22 GMT
Are you all familiar with postmodernism? The nihilist philosophy developed/promoted by Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault and Jacques Lacan, et.al., that's at the basis of Identity Politics?
SOmeone has apparently developed a "Postmodernist Gibberish Generator" which will produce nonsensical academic papers that you can turn into your college humanities course. With all the inanity that's going on at many US campuses these days, no one will notice that what you wrote makes absolutely no sense at all, because in many of the humanities departments, no one is making any sense.
This Gibberish Generator produces a new nonsensical paper each time you load the page. You can get your own postmodernist academic paper here: www.elsewhere.org/pomo
Here's the nonsense paper I got: www.elsewhere.org/journal/pomo/798014864/
The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link: ( www.elsewhere.org/pomo )
If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable page.
The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).
If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, ( www.physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/ )
where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.
A video about that is here:
Or listen to George Saad relate what happened when he sat down with a postmodernist and asked if we could agree that only women bear children, (she didn't agree) or that the sun always rises in the east and sets in the west (she did not agree, she said, "it depends what you mean by 'east' and what you mean by 'west' and what you mean by 'the sun'. "
SOmeone has apparently developed a "Postmodernist Gibberish Generator" which will produce nonsensical academic papers that you can turn into your college humanities course. With all the inanity that's going on at many US campuses these days, no one will notice that what you wrote makes absolutely no sense at all, because in many of the humanities departments, no one is making any sense.
This Gibberish Generator produces a new nonsensical paper each time you load the page. You can get your own postmodernist academic paper here: www.elsewhere.org/pomo
Here's the nonsense paper I got: www.elsewhere.org/journal/pomo/798014864/
The Meaninglessness of Discourse: Semiotic deconstruction and structural
materialism
D. Ludwig Geoffrey
Department of English, Carnegie-Mellon University
1. Eco and structural materialism
If one examines predialectic textual theory, one is faced with a choice:
either accept semiotic deconstruction or conclude that the purpose of the
writer is significant form, given that sexuality is equal to narrativity.
Derrida uses the term ‘predialectic textual theory’ to denote the role of the
observer as reader.
“Society is part of the collapse of language,” says Debord; however,
according to Buxton[1] , it is not so much society that is
part of the collapse of language, but rather the economy of society. But the
subject is interpolated into a structural materialism that includes sexuality
as a paradox. Lacan promotes the use of predialectic textual theory to attack
capitalism.
It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a structural
materialism that includes truth as a whole. Bataille uses the term
‘conceptualist deconstruction’ to denote a neotextual paradox.
But the premise of structural materialism suggests that expression is
created by communication. Lyotard uses the term ‘predialectic textual theory’
to denote not, in fact, discourse, but postdiscourse.
It could be said that in The Name of the Rose, Eco affirms cultural
rationalism; in Foucault’s Pendulum, however, he analyses structural
materialism. Foucault uses the term ‘Derridaist reading’ to denote the fatal
flaw, and subsequent failure, of preconstructive sexual identity.
Thus, any number of sublimations concerning structural materialism exist.
The subject is interpolated into a predialectic textual theory that includes
sexuality as a totality.
2. Structural materialism and cultural objectivism
The main theme of the works of Eco is the bridge between class and language.
In a sense, Bataille’s analysis of the neomaterial paradigm of consensus holds
that class has objective value. The characteristic theme of Wilson’s[2] critique of semiotic deconstruction is the role of the
writer as poet.
Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a structural materialism that
includes narrativity as a paradox. Baudrillard uses the term ‘semiotic
deconstruction’ to denote not narrative, but postnarrative.
In a sense, the primary theme of the works of Gaiman is a self-justifying
whole. Sontag suggests the use of cultural objectivism to read and modify
sexual identity.
1. Buxton, T. N. (1990) Semiotic
deconstruction, the postdialectic paradigm of discourse and capitalism.
Yale University Press
2. Wilson, R. V. D. ed. (1979) The Absurdity of Society:
Structural materialism in the works of Gaiman. University of Southern North
Dakota at Hoople Press
materialism
D. Ludwig Geoffrey
Department of English, Carnegie-Mellon University
1. Eco and structural materialism
If one examines predialectic textual theory, one is faced with a choice:
either accept semiotic deconstruction or conclude that the purpose of the
writer is significant form, given that sexuality is equal to narrativity.
Derrida uses the term ‘predialectic textual theory’ to denote the role of the
observer as reader.
“Society is part of the collapse of language,” says Debord; however,
according to Buxton[1] , it is not so much society that is
part of the collapse of language, but rather the economy of society. But the
subject is interpolated into a structural materialism that includes sexuality
as a paradox. Lacan promotes the use of predialectic textual theory to attack
capitalism.
It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a structural
materialism that includes truth as a whole. Bataille uses the term
‘conceptualist deconstruction’ to denote a neotextual paradox.
But the premise of structural materialism suggests that expression is
created by communication. Lyotard uses the term ‘predialectic textual theory’
to denote not, in fact, discourse, but postdiscourse.
It could be said that in The Name of the Rose, Eco affirms cultural
rationalism; in Foucault’s Pendulum, however, he analyses structural
materialism. Foucault uses the term ‘Derridaist reading’ to denote the fatal
flaw, and subsequent failure, of preconstructive sexual identity.
Thus, any number of sublimations concerning structural materialism exist.
The subject is interpolated into a predialectic textual theory that includes
sexuality as a totality.
2. Structural materialism and cultural objectivism
The main theme of the works of Eco is the bridge between class and language.
In a sense, Bataille’s analysis of the neomaterial paradigm of consensus holds
that class has objective value. The characteristic theme of Wilson’s[2] critique of semiotic deconstruction is the role of the
writer as poet.
Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a structural materialism that
includes narrativity as a paradox. Baudrillard uses the term ‘semiotic
deconstruction’ to denote not narrative, but postnarrative.
In a sense, the primary theme of the works of Gaiman is a self-justifying
whole. Sontag suggests the use of cultural objectivism to read and modify
sexual identity.
1. Buxton, T. N. (1990) Semiotic
deconstruction, the postdialectic paradigm of discourse and capitalism.
Yale University Press
2. Wilson, R. V. D. ed. (1979) The Absurdity of Society:
Structural materialism in the works of Gaiman. University of Southern North
Dakota at Hoople Press
The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link: ( www.elsewhere.org/pomo )
If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable page.
The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).
If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, ( www.physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/ )
where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.
A video about that is here:
Or listen to George Saad relate what happened when he sat down with a postmodernist and asked if we could agree that only women bear children, (she didn't agree) or that the sun always rises in the east and sets in the west (she did not agree, she said, "it depends what you mean by 'east' and what you mean by 'west' and what you mean by 'the sun'. "